ECLI:EU:C:2012:411•Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2012.#Procura della Repubblica v Abd Aziz Tam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Giudice di Pace di Revere — Interpretation of Articles 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 15 and 16 of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98) and of Article 4(3) TEU — National legislation imposing a fine on a third-country national who has entered or stayed in the country illegally — Admissibility of the criminal offence of illegal stay — Possibility of substituting the fine with an order for expulsion with immediate effect for a period of at least five years or with a home detention (‘permanenza domiciliare’) sentence — Obligations of the Member States during the period prescribed for the transposition of a directive.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — No description of the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C‑74/12.
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2012.#Procura della Repubblica v Abd Aziz Tam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Giudice di Pace di Revere — Interpretation of Articles 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 15 and 16 of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98) and of Article 4(3) TEU — National legislation imposing a fine on a third-country national who has entered or stayed in the country illegally — Admissibility of the criminal offence of illegal stay — Possibility of substituting the fine with an order for expulsion with immediate effect for a period of at least five years or with a home detention (‘permanenza domiciliare’) sentence — Obligations of the Member States during the period prescribed for the transposition of a directive.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — No description of the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C‑74/12.
ECLI:EU:C:2012:411Eu Chamb 05 CJul 4, 2012
Full text
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2012 —
Tam
(Case C-74/12)
Reference for a preliminary ruling — No description of the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility
Preliminary rulings — Admissibility — Questions referred without sufficient information on the factual and legislative context — Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 92(1) and 103(1)) (see paras 5-7)
Re:
| Reference for a preliminary ruling — Giudice di Pace di Revere — Interpretation of Articles 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 15 and 16 of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98) and of Article 4(3) TEU — National legislation imposing a fine on a third-country national who has entered or stayed in the country illegally — Admissibility of the criminal offence of illegal stay — Possibility of substituting the fine with an order for expulsion with immediate effect for a period of at least five years or with a home detention (‘permanenza domiciliare’) sentence — Obligations of the Member States during the period prescribed for the transposition of a directive. |
Operative part
The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Revere (Italy), by decision of 26 January 2012, is manifestly inadmissible.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.