Omnilex Logo
Legal research
Legal research
Corpus
Corpus

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Are you a lawyer?

Discover Omnilex, your workspace for faster legal research.

Already trusted by over 6,000 lawyers.

Try Omnilex
Settings
Settings
Court decisions

ECLI:EU:C:2012:292•Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 May 2012.#Sepracor Pharmaceuticals (Ireland) Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 — Medicinal products for human use — Active substance ‘eszopiclone’ — Marketing authorisation — Procedure — Statement of position by the Commission — Status of ‘new active substance’ — Concept of ‘actionable measure’.#Case C‑477/11 P.

Open source

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 May 2012.#Sepracor Pharmaceuticals (Ireland) Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 — Medicinal products for human use — Active substance ‘eszopiclone’ — Marketing authorisation — Procedure — Statement of position by the Commission — Status of ‘new active substance’ — Concept of ‘actionable measure’.#Case C‑477/11 P.

ECLI:EU:C:2012:292Eu Chamb 08 CMay 14, 2012

Open source

Full text

Subject of the case
Operative part

Subject of the case

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 July 2011 in Case T‑275/09 P Sepracor Pharmaceuticals v Commission , dismissing as inadmissible an application for the annulment of the Commission’s decision of 6 May 2009 finding, in the context of the procedure for granting marketing authorisation for the medicinal product ‘Lunivia’, produced by the appellant, that the active substance ‘eszopiclone’, which it contains, does not constitute a new active substance within the meaning of Article 3(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2004 L 136, p. 1) — Concept of actionable measure.

Operative part

Operative part

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Sepracor Pharmaceuticals Ltd is ordered to pay the costs.

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.