ECLI:EU:C:2012:653•Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 October 2012.#Erika Šujetová v Rapid life životná poisťovňa, as.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Krajský súd v Prešove (Slovakia) — Interpretation of Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29) — Provision of national law under which exclusive jurisdiction in relation to an application for annulment of an arbitral award is attributed to the court in whose area of jurisdiction the arbitration proceedings took place — Provision of national law under which that court is under an obligation, upon annulling an arbitral award, to continue the main proceedings without re-examining its territorial jurisdiction — Unfair arbitration agreement or arbitration clause.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — No need to adjudicate.#Case C‑252/11.
Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 October 2012.#Erika Šujetová v Rapid life životná poisťovňa, as.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Krajský súd v Prešove (Slovakia) — Interpretation of Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29) — Provision of national law under which exclusive jurisdiction in relation to an application for annulment of an arbitral award is attributed to the court in whose area of jurisdiction the arbitration proceedings took place — Provision of national law under which that court is under an obligation, upon annulling an arbitral award, to continue the main proceedings without re-examining its territorial jurisdiction — Unfair arbitration agreement or arbitration clause.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — No need to adjudicate.#Case C‑252/11.
ECLI:EU:C:2012:653Eu Chamb 01 COct 22, 2012
Full text
Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 October 2012 — Šujetová
(Case C-252/11)
Reference for a preliminary ruling — No need to adjudicate
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Jurisdiction of the Court — Case pending before the national court rendered devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate (Art. 267 TFEU) (see paras 13-15)
Re:
| Reference for a preliminary ruling — Krajský súd v Prešove (Slovakia) — Interpretation of Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29) — Provision of national law under which exclusive jurisdiction in relation to an application for annulment of an arbitral award is attributed to the court in whose area of jurisdiction the arbitration proceedings took place — Provision of national law under which that court is under an obligation, upon annulling an arbitral award, to continue the main proceedings without re-examining its territorial jurisdiction — Unfair arbitration agreement or arbitration clause. |
Operative part
It is not necessary to give a ruling on the reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Krajský súd v Prešove (Slovakia), by decision of 7 April 2011 in Case C-252/11.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.