ECLI:EU:C:2012:618•Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 October 2012.#ED et F Man Alcohols v Office national interprofessionnel des fruits, des légumes, des vins et de l'horticulture (Viniflhor).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Conseil d’État – Interpretation of Article 5(5) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 360/95 of 22 February 1995 opening individual sales by invitation to tender for the export of vinous alcohol held by intervention agencies (OJ 1995 L 41, p. 14), of Article 91(12) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 of 25 July 2000 laying down detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine, with regard to market mechanisms (OJ 2000 L 194, p. 45), of Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests (OJ 1995 L 312, p. 1), and of the provisions of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 377/93 of 12 February 1993 laying down detailed rules for the disposal of alcohol obtained from the distillation operations referred to in Articles 35, 36 and 39 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 and held by intervention agencies (OJ 1993 L 43, p. 6) and of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2220/85 of 22 July 1985 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of securities for agricultural products (OJ 1985 L 205, p. 5) – Individual sales by invitation to tender for the export of vinous alcohol held by intervention agencies for the purpose of an end use as motor fuel – Time-limit for export exceeded by the successful tenderer – Administrative penalties or other measures – Failure likely to prejudice the budget of the European Union.#Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Scope ratione materiae – Meaning of ‘detriment to the financial interests of the European Union’ – Individual invitation to tender for the export of vinous alcohol held by intervention agencies – Export of quantities of alcohol outside the European Union after the expiry of the prescribed time-limit – Retention of the performance guarantee – Administrative measures – Administrative penalties – Regulation (EC) No 360/95 – Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 – Retroactive application of a less severe penalty.#Case C‑669/11.
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 October 2012.#ED et F Man Alcohols v Office national interprofessionnel des fruits, des légumes, des vins et de l'horticulture (Viniflhor).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Conseil d’État – Interpretation of Article 5(5) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 360/95 of 22 February 1995 opening individual sales by invitation to tender for the export of vinous alcohol held by intervention agencies (OJ 1995 L 41, p. 14), of Article 91(12) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 of 25 July 2000 laying down detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine, with regard to market mechanisms (OJ 2000 L 194, p. 45), of Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests (OJ 1995 L 312, p. 1), and of the provisions of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 377/93 of 12 February 1993 laying down detailed rules for the disposal of alcohol obtained from the distillation operations referred to in Articles 35, 36 and 39 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 and held by intervention agencies (OJ 1993 L 43, p. 6) and of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2220/85 of 22 July 1985 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of securities for agricultural products (OJ 1985 L 205, p. 5) – Individual sales by invitation to tender for the export of vinous alcohol held by intervention agencies for the purpose of an end use as motor fuel – Time-limit for export exceeded by the successful tenderer – Administrative penalties or other measures – Failure likely to prejudice the budget of the European Union.#Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Scope ratione materiae – Meaning of ‘detriment to the financial interests of the European Union’ – Individual invitation to tender for the export of vinous alcohol held by intervention agencies – Export of quantities of alcohol outside the European Union after the expiry of the prescribed time-limit – Retention of the performance guarantee – Administrative measures – Administrative penalties – Regulation (EC) No 360/95 – Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 – Retroactive application of a less severe penalty.#Case C‑669/11.
ECLI:EU:C:2012:618Eu Chamb 04 COct 4, 2012
Full text
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 October 2012 —
ED & F Man Alcohols
(Case C-669/11)
Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Scope ratione materiae – Meaning of ‘detriment to the financial interests of the European Union’ – Individual invitation to tender for the export of vinous alcohol held by intervention agencies – Export of quantities of alcohol outside the European Union after the expiry of the prescribed time-limit – Retention of the performance guarantee – Administrative measures – Administrative penalties – Regulation (EC) No 360/95 – Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 – Retroactive application of a less severe penalty
1. Own ressources of the European Union – Regulation on the protection of the financial interests of the Union – Irregularity – Notion – Infringement, by an operator having obtained quantities of alcohol by invitation to tender, of the obligation to export those quantities outside of the European Union within the prescribed time-limit – Included (Council Regulation No 2988/95, Art. 1; Commission Regulation No 360/95) (see paras 35-38, operative part 1)
2. Own ressources of the European Union – Regulation on the protection of the financial interests of the Union – Administrative penalty – Notion – Loss in whole or in part of the performance guarantee provided by an exporter in order to ensure compliance with its obligations, such as export within the time-limit allowed – Included (Council Regulation No 2988/95, Art. 5; Commission Regulations No 360/95, Art. 5(5) and No 1623/2000, Art. 91(12)) (see paras 40, 41, 43, operative part 2)
3. Agriculture – Common organisation of the markets – Wine – Individual sales by invitation to tender for the export of vinous alcohol outside the European Union – Administrative penalties in the event of a failure to export within the prescribed time-limit – Loss of the performance guarantee – Legal basis – Whether possible to impose a penalty on the sole basis of Article 5 of Regulation No 2988/95 – Requirement to base a penalty on Article 5(5) of Regulation No 360/95 (Council Regulation No 2988/95, Art. 5; Commission Regulation No 360/95, Art. 5(5)) (see paras 46-49, operative part 3)
4. Agriculture – Common organisation of the markets – Wine – Individual sales by invitation to tender for the export of vinous alcohol outside the European Union – Irregularity leading to a penalty – No retroactive applicability of less severe fines resulting from the combined provisions of Regulation No 2988/1995 and No 1623/2000 – Application of Regulation No 360/95 as a special law concerning only certain exports to Brazil (Council Regulation 2988/95, Art. 2(2); Commission Regulations No 2220/85, Art. 23, No 360/95, Art. 5(5) and No 1623/2000, Arts 91(2), 12, 13 and 100) (see paras 53, 57-60, operative part 4)
Re:
| Reference for a preliminary ruling – Conseil d’État – Interpretation of Article 5(5) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 360/95 of 22 February 1995 opening individual sales by invitation to tender for the export of vinous alcohol held by intervention agencies (OJ 1995 L 41, p. 14), of Article 91(12) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 of 25 July 2000 laying down detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine, with regard to market mechanisms (OJ 2000 L 194, p. 45), of Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests (OJ 1995 L 312, p. 1), and of the provisions of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 377/93 of 12 February 1993 laying down detailed rules for the disposal of alcohol obtained from the distillation operations referred to in Articles 35, 36 and 39 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 and held by intervention agencies (OJ 1993 L 43, p. 6) and of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2220/85 of 22 July 1985 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of securities for agricultural products (OJ 1985 L 205, p. 5) – Individual sales by invitation to tender for the export of vinous alcohol held by intervention agencies for the purpose of an end use as motor fuel – Time-limit for export exceeded by the successful tenderer – Administrative penalties or other measures – Failure likely to prejudice the budget of the European Union. |
Operative part
|
1. |
The failure of an operator to comply with the time-limit for export imposed in respect of quantities of alcohol obtained in an invitation to tender procedure organised by the European Commission, as governed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 360/95 of 22 February 1995 opening individual sales by invitation to tender for the export of vinous alcohol held by intervention agencies, constitutes an ‘irregularity’ within the meaning of Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests. |
|
2. |
The loss in whole or in part of a performance guarantee, such as that provided for in Article 5(5) of Regulation No 360/95, or of a security to ensure export within the time allowed, such as that provided for in Article 91(12) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 of 25 July 2000 laying down detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine, with regard to market mechanisms, is covered by the concept of ‘administrative penalty’ within the meaning of Article 5 of Regulation No 2988/95. |
|
3. |
In circumstances such as those of the main proceedings, Article 5(5) of Regulation No 360/95 constitutes the necessary legal basis for the imposition of a penalty consisting of the loss in whole or in part of a performance guarantee. |
|
4. |
In circumstances such as those of the main proceedings, Article 2(2) of Regulation No 2988/95 must be interpreted as meaning that, in order to penalise a failure to comply with the time-limit allowed for the export to Brazil of quantities of alcohol obtained by invitation to tender under the provisions of Regulation No 360/95, the national authorities must apply the penalty laid down in Article 5(5) of the latter regulation, and not that laid down in Article 91(12) of Regulation No 1623/2000. |
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.