ECLI:EU:C:2012:498•Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 July 2012.#Kaimer GmbH & Co. Holding KG and Others v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Penalty — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Probative value of statements made in the context of the leniency policy.#Case C‑264/11 P.
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 July 2012.#Kaimer GmbH & Co. Holding KG and Others v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Penalty — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Probative value of statements made in the context of the leniency policy.#Case C‑264/11 P.
ECLI:EU:C:2012:498Eu Chamb 03 CJul 19, 2012
Full text
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 July 2012 —
Kaimer and Others v Commission
(Case C-264/11 P)
Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Penalty — Copper and copper alloy fittings sector — Probative value of statements made in the context of the leniency policy
1. Appeals — Grounds — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted — Assessment of whether the evidence has been distorted in the context of cartel cases (Art. 81(1) EC; Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58(1)) (see paras 22-24, 31)
2. Appeals — Grounds — Mistaken assessment of the facts — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the findings of fact — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted — Assessment made by the General Court of the probative value of the statements of a leniency applicant — Issue of fact (Art. 81(1) EC; Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58(1)) (see paras 45-47)
3. Appeals — Grounds — Necessity of a specific challenge to a point in the General Court’s reasoning (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58(1); Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 112(1)(1)(c)) (see para. 61)
4. Appeals — Grounds — Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal — Inadmissibility (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 113(2)) (see para. 65)
Re:
| Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2011 in Case T-379/06 | Kaimer and Others | v | Commission | , by which the General Court dismissed in part the appellants’ action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 4180 final of 20 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement concerning a cartel in the copper and copper alloy fittings sector or, in the alternative, for a reduction in the fine imposed on the appellants — Distortion of the evidence — Error of assessment regarding the probative value of statements made in the context of the leniency policy — Infringement of Articles 6 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union |
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders Kaimer GmbH & Co. Holding KG, Sanha Kaimer GmbH & Co. KG and Sanha Italia Srl to pay the costs. |
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.