ECLI:EU:T:2011:684•Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 November 2011.#Sports Warehouse GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark TENNIS WAREHOUSE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Distinctive character - Obligation to state reasons - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-290/10.
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 November 2011.#Sports Warehouse GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark TENNIS WAREHOUSE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Distinctive character - Obligation to state reasons - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-290/10.
ECLI:EU:T:2011:684Eu Chamb 04 TNov 22, 2011
Full text
Subject of the case
Operative part
Subject of the case
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 April 2010 (Case R 1259/2009‑1) concerning an application for registration of the word sign TENNIS WAREHOUSE as a Community trade mark.
Operative part
Operative part
The Court:
1. Dismisses the action;
2. Orders Sports Warehouse GmbH to pay the costs.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.