Omnilex Logo
Legal research
Legal research
Corpus
Corpus

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Are you a lawyer?

Discover Omnilex, your workspace for faster legal research.

Already trusted by over 6,000 lawyers.

Try Omnilex
Settings
Settings
Court decisions

ECLI:EU:T:2011:660•Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 November 2011.#Computer Task Group Luxembourg PSF SA (CTG Luxembourg PSF) v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Public service contracts - Procurement procedure - Provision of support services to IT systems users - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid because it was lodged out of time - Award of contract to another tenderer - Action for annulment - Non-contractual liability.#Joined cases T-170/10 and T-340/10.

Open source

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 November 2011.#Computer Task Group Luxembourg PSF SA (CTG Luxembourg PSF) v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Public service contracts - Procurement procedure - Provision of support services to IT systems users - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid because it was lodged out of time - Award of contract to another tenderer - Action for annulment - Non-contractual liability.#Joined cases T-170/10 and T-340/10.

ECLI:EU:T:2011:660Eu Chamb 06 TNov 15, 2011

Open source

Full text

Subject of the case
Operative part

Subject of the case

Re:

APPLICATIONS (i) for annulment, first, of the decision of the Court of Justice of 9 February 2010 to reject the tender submitted by the consortium of which the applicant is a member in the context of procurement procedure reference AO 008/2009 entitled ‘1 st and 2 nd level support for the users of IT and telephone systems, call centre, end user hardware management’ and, secondly, of the decision of 5 March 2010 confirming the rejection and, thirdly, the decision to award the contract to another tenderer, and (ii) for compensation for the loss allegedly incurred by the applicant as a result of those decisions.

Operative part

Operative part

The Court:

1. Dismisses the applications;

2. Orders Computer Task Group Luxembourg PSF SA (CTG Luxembourg PSF) to pay the costs.

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.