ECLI:EU:T:2012:18•Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 January 2012.#Xeda International SA and Pace International LLC v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance diphenylamine – Non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC – Withdrawal of authorisations of plant protection products containing that substance – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Proportionality – Article 6(1) of Directive 91/414 – Rights of the defence – Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1095/2007.#Case T-71/10.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 January 2012.#Xeda International SA and Pace International LLC v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance diphenylamine – Non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC – Withdrawal of authorisations of plant protection products containing that substance – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Proportionality – Article 6(1) of Directive 91/414 – Rights of the defence – Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1095/2007.#Case T-71/10.
ECLI:EU:T:2012:18Eu Chamb 05 TJan 19, 2012
Full text
Subject of the case
Operative part
Subject of the case
Re:
APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision 2009/859/EC of 30 November 2009 concerning the non-inclusion of diphenylamine in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance (OJ 2009 L 314, p. 79).
Operative part
Operative part
The Court:
1. Dismisses the action;
2. Orders Xeda International SA and Pace International LLC to bear their own costs and to pay those of the European Commission, including the costs relating to the proceedings for interim measures.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.