ECLI:EU:C:2011:726•Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 November 2011.#Kalliope Agapiou Joséphidès v European Commission and Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA, Brussels).#Appeal - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Article 4(1)(b) and (2), first indent - Protection of private life and integrity of the individual - Protection of commercial interests - Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 - Executive agencies - Competence to handle confirmatory requests regarding applications for access to documents - Principle of transparency - 'Overriding public interest' - Errors of law.#Case C-626/10 P.
Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 November 2011.#Kalliope Agapiou Joséphidès v European Commission and Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA, Brussels).#Appeal - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Article 4(1)(b) and (2), first indent - Protection of private life and integrity of the individual - Protection of commercial interests - Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 - Executive agencies - Competence to handle confirmatory requests regarding applications for access to documents - Principle of transparency - 'Overriding public interest' - Errors of law.#Case C-626/10 P.
ECLI:EU:C:2011:726Eu Chamb 01 CNov 10, 2011
Full text
Subject of the case
Operative part
Subject of the case
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 October 2010 in Case T‑439/08 Agapiou Joséphidès v Commission and EACEA , by which that court dismissed the action brought by the applicant seeking annulment, first, of the decision of EACEA of 1 August 2008 relating to an application for access to documents concerning the allocation of a Jean Monnet centre of excellence to the University of Cyprus and, second, of Commission Decision C(2007) 3749 of 8 August 2007 relating to an individual decision to allocate subsidies in the context of the lifelong learning programme, a Jean Monnet sub-programme – Infringement of the right of access to documents and of the principle of transparency – Errors of law.
Operative part
Operative part
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. Ms Agapiou Joséphidès is ordered to pay the costs.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.