Omnilex Logo
Legal research
Legal research
Corpus
Corpus

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Are you a lawyer?

Discover Omnilex, your workspace for faster legal research.

Already trusted by over 6,000 lawyers.

Try Omnilex
Settings
Settings
Court decisions

ECLI:EU:C:2011:263•Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 April 2011.#Dieter C. Umbach v European Commission.#Appeal - Access to the documents of the Institutions - 'TACIS programme' - Contract concluded by the Commission - Termination of the contract - Dispute between the contracting parties - Application for access to documents - Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-609/10 P.

Open source

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 April 2011.#Dieter C. Umbach v European Commission.#Appeal - Access to the documents of the Institutions - 'TACIS programme' - Contract concluded by the Commission - Termination of the contract - Dispute between the contracting parties - Application for access to documents - Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-609/10 P.

ECLI:EU:C:2011:263Eu Chamb 08 CApr 14, 2011

Open source

Full text

Subject of the case
Operative part

Subject of the case

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 October 2010 in Case T‑474/08 Umbach v Commission , by which that court dismissed an action for the annulment of the Commission Decision of 2 September 2008 refusing the appellant access to certain information included in documents relating to a contract concluded between the appellant and the Commission and concerning assistance with the drafting of an administrative code on behalf of the Russian Federation in the context of the TACIS programme – Application for access concerning the dispute between the appellant and the Commission following the termination of that contract – Infringement of Article 41(2)(b) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

Operative part

Operative part

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Mr Umbach is ordered to pay the costs.

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.