ECLI:EU:C:2011:105Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 March 2011.#Claro SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Appeal - Community trade mark - Refusal of registration - Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal - Failure to file a statement setting out the grounds of appeal - Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Rule 49(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-349/10 P.

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 March 2011.#Claro SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Appeal - Community trade mark - Refusal of registration - Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal - Failure to file a statement setting out the grounds of appeal - Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Rule 49(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-349/10 P.

ECLI:EU:C:2011:105Eu Chamb 06 CMar 2, 2011

Open source

Full text

Subject of the case
Operative part

Subject of the case

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 April 2010 in Case T‑225/09 Claro v OHIM and Telefónica , by which that court dismissed the action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 February 2009 (Case R 1079/2008‑2) concerning opposition proceedings between Telefónica, SA and BCP S/A

Operative part

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Claro SA shall pay the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.