Omnilex Logo
Legal research
Legal research
Corpus
Corpus

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Are you a lawyer?

Discover Omnilex, your workspace for faster legal research.

Already trusted by over 6,000 lawyers.

Try Omnilex
Settings
Settings
Court decisions

ECLI:EU:C:2011:182•Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 March 2011.#Robert Nicolaus Abt and Others v Hypo Real Estate Holding AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Landgericht München I - Germany.#Reference for a preliminary ruling - Relevance of the question - No jurisdiction.#Case C-194/10.

Open source

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 March 2011.#Robert Nicolaus Abt and Others v Hypo Real Estate Holding AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Landgericht München I - Germany.#Reference for a preliminary ruling - Relevance of the question - No jurisdiction.#Case C-194/10.

ECLI:EU:C:2011:182Eu Chamb 06 CMar 24, 2011

Open source

Full text

Subject of the case
Operative part

Subject of the case

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Landgericht München I – Interpretation of Article 297 EC and of Article 5(1) of Directive 2007/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies (OJ 2007 L 184, p. 17) – Period for convocation of general meeting of a listed company – National legislation, ceasing to have effect on the expiry of the transposition period for the directive, which provides for a shorter convocation period than the minimum period under the directive – Provision likely seriously to compromise the result prescribed by the directive, in the light of the national legislation according to which some decisions of the general meeting remain valid after being registered in the commercial register, even in the event of annulment following legal action.

Operative part

Operative part

The Court of Justice of the European Union has no jurisdiction to answer the first question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Landgericht München I.

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.