ECLI:EU:C:2011:416•Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 June 2011.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Appeal - Community trade mark - Refusal to register signs '350', '250', '150', '222', '333' and '555' as trade marks for periodicals, books and game booklets - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(c) - Descriptive character - Obligation on OHIM to take account of its earlier decision-making practice.#Joined cases C-54/10 P and C-55/10 P.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 June 2011.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Appeal - Community trade mark - Refusal to register signs '350', '250', '150', '222', '333' and '555' as trade marks for periodicals, books and game booklets - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(c) - Descriptive character - Obligation on OHIM to take account of its earlier decision-making practice.#Joined cases C-54/10 P and C-55/10 P.
ECLI:EU:C:2011:416Eu Chamb 07 CJun 22, 2011
Full text
Subject of the case
Operative part
Subject of the case
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-64/07 to T‑66/07 and in Joined Cases T-200/07 to T-202/07 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM , by which that court dismissed the six actions brought against the decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 December 2006 (Cases R 1033/2006-4, R 1034/2006-4, R 1035/2006-4, R 1276/2006‑4, R 1277/2006–4 and R 1278/2006-4) concerning applications for registration of the word marks 150, 250, 350, 222, 333 and 555 as Community trade marks – Infringement of Articles 7(1)(c) and 76 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1), as replaced by Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1) – Descriptive character of marks composed exclusively of figures.
Operative part
Operative part
1. The appeals are dismissed.
2. Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. is ordered to pay the costs.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.