Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 May 2011.#Tony Georgiev Semerdzhiev v Del-Pi-Krasimira Mancheva.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Varhoven kasatsionen sad - Bulgaria.#Article 92(1) of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 90/314/EEC - Package travel, package holidays and package tours - Facts preceding the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria to the European Union - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court to answer the questions referred.#Case C-32/10.

ECLI:EU:C:2011:288Eu Chamb 05 CMay 11, 2011

Open source

Full text

Subject of the case
Operative part

Subject of the case

Re

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Varhoven kasatsionen sad – Interpretation of Articles 2(1)(c), 4(1)(b)(iv) and 5(2)(3) and (4) of Council Directive 90/314/EEC of 13 June 1990 on package travel, package holidays and package tours (OJ 1990 L 158, p. 59) – Concept of ‘other tourist services’ not ancillary to transport or accommodation to be borne by the organiser – Obligation of the organiser to conclude an individual insurance contract for each consumer and to provide the consumer with the original before travel – Obligation of the organiser to conclude an individual insurance contract covering costs of repatriation in case of accident – Concept of ‘damage’ resulting for the consumer from the failure to perform or the improper performance of the contract – Non-material damages included.

Operative part

Operative part

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to rule on the questions referred by the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria).

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.