Omnilex Logo
Legal research
Legal research
Corpus
Corpus

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Are you a lawyer?

Discover Omnilex, your workspace for faster legal research.

Already trusted by over 6,000 lawyers.

Try Omnilex
Settings
Settings
Court decisions

ECLI:EU:C:2010:260•Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 May 2010.#Paul Inge Hansen v European Commission.#Appeal - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - Application seeking to have the Commission bring infringement proceedings - Application for directions addressed to the Commission - Adoption of measures intended to ensure equal treatment for handicapped persons in the sphere of employment - Clear inadmissibility of the appeal.#Case C-26/10 P.

Open source

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 May 2010.#Paul Inge Hansen v European Commission.#Appeal - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - Application seeking to have the Commission bring infringement proceedings - Application for directions addressed to the Commission - Adoption of measures intended to ensure equal treatment for handicapped persons in the sphere of employment - Clear inadmissibility of the appeal.#Case C-26/10 P.

ECLI:EU:C:2010:260Eu Chamb 07 CMay 6, 2010

Open source

Full text

Subject of the case
Operative part

Subject of the case

Re:

Appeal lodged against the order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 17 November 2009 in Case T‑295/09 Hansen v Commission , by which that court dismissed as manifestly inadmissble an action seeking a declaration of failure to act by the Commission in that the latter had failed to bring proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC against the Kingdom of Sweden, and seeking an order that the Commission exercise its right of initiative, adopt measures and support initiatives intended to promote the right of handicapped persons to equal treatment and non-discrimination in their professional lives.

Operative part

Operative part:

The Court:

1. Dismisses the appeal;

2. Orders Mr Hansen to bear his own costs.

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.