Omnilex Logo
Legal research
Legal research
Corpus
Corpus

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Are you a lawyer?

Discover Omnilex, your workspace for faster legal research.

Already trusted by over 6,000 lawyers.

Try Omnilex
Settings
Settings
Court decisions

ECLI:EU:C:2011:15•Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 January 2011.#Media-Saturn-Holding GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Appeal - Community trade mark - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character- Mark consisting of an advertising slogan and composed of elements individually devoid of any distinctive character - Figurative sign 'BEST BUY'.#Case C-92/10 P.

Open source

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 January 2011.#Media-Saturn-Holding GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Appeal - Community trade mark - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character- Mark consisting of an advertising slogan and composed of elements individually devoid of any distinctive character - Figurative sign 'BEST BUY'.#Case C-92/10 P.

ECLI:EU:C:2011:15Eu Chamb 05 CJan 13, 2011

Open source

Full text

Subject of the case
Operative part

Subject of the case

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 December 2009 in Case T-476/08 Media-Saturn v OHIM (BEST BUY) by which that court dismissed the action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM, of 28 August 2008, dismissing the appeal against the examiner’s decision which refused the registration of the figurative sign ‘BEST BUY’ as a Community trade mark for goods and services in Classes 1, 2, 5 to 12, 14 to 17, 20 to 22, 27, 28, 35, 37, 38 and 40 to 42 – distinctive character of a mark consisting of an advertising slogan and composed of elements individually devoid of any distinctive character.

Operative part

Operative part

The Court:

1. Dismisses the appeal;

2. Orders Ifemy’s Holding GmbH to pay the costs.

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.