ECLI:EU:C:2010:573•Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 September 2010.#European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directives 96/82/EC and 2003/105/EC - Control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances - Second subparagraph of Article 12(1) - Incorrect transposition.#Case C-36/10.
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 September 2010.#European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directives 96/82/EC and 2003/105/EC - Control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances - Second subparagraph of Article 12(1) - Incorrect transposition.#Case C-36/10.
ECLI:EU:C:2010:573Eu Chamb 07 CSep 30, 2010
Full text
Subject of the case
Operative part
Subject of the case
Re:
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations – Failure to adopt all the measures necessary in order to comply with Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances (OJ 1997 L 10, p. 13), as amended by Directive 2003/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2003 (OJ 2003 L 345, p. 97).
Operative part
Operative part
The Court:
1. Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period all the measures to transpose correctly the second subparagraph of Article 12(1) of Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, as amended by Directive 2003/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2003, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;
2. Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.