Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 May 2011.#Jager & Polacek GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark REDTUBE - Earlier unregistered national mark Redtube - Failure to pay the opposition fee within the prescribed period - Decision deeming the opposition non-existent - Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 - Protection of legitimate expectations - Rule 17 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Ex parte proceedings - Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 - Rule 18 of Regulation No 2868/95 - Legal nature of a communication from OHIM informing a party that an opposition has been found to be admissible - Rule of parallelism of procedural requirements and of the actus contrarius - Article 80 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-488/09.

ECLI:EU:T:2011:211Eu Chamb 07 TMay 12, 2011

Open source

Full text

Subject of the case
Operative part

Subject of the case

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 September 2009 (Case R 442/2009-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Jager & Polacek GmbH and RT Mediasolutions s.r.o.

Information relating to the case

>lt>12

Operative part

Operative part

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Jager & Polacek GmbH to pay the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.