ECLI:EU:T:2012:529•Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 October 2012.#Ningbo Yonghong Fasteners Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union.#Dumping — Imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China — Market economy treatment — Time-limit for adopting the decision on that treatment — Manifest error of assessment — Burden of proof — Adjustment to costs — Article 2(5) and (7)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 2(5) and (7)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.#Case T‑150/09.
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 October 2012.#Ningbo Yonghong Fasteners Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union.#Dumping — Imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China — Market economy treatment — Time-limit for adopting the decision on that treatment — Manifest error of assessment — Burden of proof — Adjustment to costs — Article 2(5) and (7)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 2(5) and (7)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.#Case T‑150/09.
ECLI:EU:T:2012:529Eu Chamb 07 TOct 10, 2012
Full text
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 October 2012 — Ningbo Yonghong Fasteners v Council
(Case T-150/09)
Dumping — Imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China — Market economy treatment — Time-limit for adopting the decision on that treatment — Manifest error of assessment — Burden of proof — Adjustment to costs — Article 2(5) and (7)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 2(5) and (7)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009)
1. Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Measures of direct and individual concern to them — Regulation imposing anti-dumping duties — Varying duties imposed on a series of undertakings — Admissibility limited, for each undertaking, to the provisions of the regulation concerning it (Art. 230, fourth para., EC) (see paras 47, 48)
2. Common commercial policy — Protection against dumping — Dumping margin — Determination of the normal value — Imports from countries not having a market economy as referred to in Article 2(7)(b) of Regulation No 384/96 — Procedure for assessing the conditions allowing a producer to benefit from market economy treatment — Commission exceeding the three-month time-limit laid down by Article 2(7)(c), second paragraph, of that regulation — Consequences (Council Regulation No 384/96, as amended by Regulation No 1225/2009, Art. 2(7)(c)) (see paras 50, 53-55, 57, 59, 64, 65, 68)
3. Common commercial policy — Protection against dumping — Dumping margin — Determination of the normal value — Granting of market economy operator status — Conditions — Burden of proof on producers — Assessment of evidence a matter for the institutions — Judicial review — Limits (Council Regulation No 384/96, as amended by Regulation No 1225/2009, Art. 2(7)(b) and (c)) (see paras 75-77, 99, 100)
4. European Union law — Interpretation — Methods — Literal, systematic, historic and teleological interpretation — Account to be taken of the reasoning for the measure in question (see paras 114, 131-137)
5. Common commercial policy — Protection against dumping — Dumping margin — Determination of the normal value — Granting of market economy operator status — Conditions — Discretion of the institutions — Account to be taken of macroeconomic considerations — Limits — Previous practice of the institutions — Irrelevant — Assessment of the conditions for obtaining that status on a case-by-case basis (Council Regulation No 384/96, as amended by Regulation No 1225/2009, Art. 2(7)(b) and (c)) (see paras 116-120)
6. Common commercial policy — Protection against dumping — Dumping margin — Determination of the normal value — Granting of market economy operator status — Conditions — Burden of proof on producers — Not unreasonable (Council Regulation No 384/96, as amended by Regulation No 1225/2009, Art. 2(7)(b) and (c)) (see paras 124-126)
7. Common commercial policy — Protection against dumping — Dumping margin — Determination of the normal value — Article 2(5) of Regulation No 384/96 — Provision providing for a distinct phase of the said determination in relation to that referred to in paragraph 7(c) of the same article — Provision not allowing a condition for obtaining market economy operator status to be overlooked (Council Regulation No 384/96, as amended by Regulation No 1225/2009, Art. 2(5) and (7)(c)) (see paras 138, 139)
Re:
| APPLICATION for annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 of 26 January 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2009 L 29, p. 1). |
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Ningbo Yonghong Fasteners Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Council of the European Union and of the European Industrial Fasteners Institute AISBL; |
|
3. |
Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.