ECLI:EU:T:2010:458Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 October 2010.#Farmeco AE Dermokallyntika v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark BOTUMAX - Earlier Community word and figurative marks BOTOX - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Damage to reputation - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009).#Case T-131/09.

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 October 2010.#Farmeco AE Dermokallyntika v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark BOTUMAX - Earlier Community word and figurative marks BOTOX - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Damage to reputation - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009).#Case T-131/09.

ECLI:EU:T:2010:458Eu Chamb 08 TOct 28, 2010

Open source

Full text

Subject of the case
Operative part

Subject of the case

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 February 2009 (Case R 60/2008-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Allergan Inc. and Farmeco AE Dermokallyntika.

Information relating to the case

>lt>4

Operative part

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Farmeco AE Dermokallyntika to pay the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.