ECLI:EU:T:2010:80•Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 March 2010.#Européenne de traitement de l’information (Euro-Information) v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark EURO AUTOMATIC CASH - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94(now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009).#Case T-15/09.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 March 2010.#Européenne de traitement de l’information (Euro-Information) v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark EURO AUTOMATIC CASH - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94(now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009).#Case T-15/09.
ECLI:EU:T:2010:80Eu Chamb 02 TMar 9, 2010
Full text
Subject of the case
Operative part
Subject of the case
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 November 2008 (Case R 70/2006‑4) concerning an application for registration of the word sign EURO AUTOMATIC CASH as a Community trade mark.
Information relating to the case
>lt>13
Operative part
Operative part
The Court:
1. Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 18 November 2008 (Case R 70/2006-4);
2. Orders OHIM to pay four fifths of the costs incurred by the parties before the Court;
3. Orders Européenne de traitement de l'information (Euro-Information) to pay one fifth of the costs incurred by the parties before the Court;
4. Orders OHIM to pay the essential costs incurred by the applicant for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.