ECLI:EU:C:2010:123•Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 March 2010.#Constantin Hârsulescu v Roumanie.#Appeal - Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court to examine an action seeking annulment of decisions of national courts, compensation for damage caused by national authorities and a declaration that those authorities have failed to act - Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-374/09 P.
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 March 2010.#Constantin Hârsulescu v Roumanie.#Appeal - Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court to examine an action seeking annulment of decisions of national courts, compensation for damage caused by national authorities and a declaration that those authorities have failed to act - Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-374/09 P.
ECLI:EU:C:2010:123Eu Chamb 05 CMar 4, 2010
Full text
Subject of the case
Operative part
Subject of the case
Re:
Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 22 July 2009 in Case T-234/09 Hârsulescu v Romania in which the Court of First Instance held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the applicant’s action for the annulment of two judgments given by national courts and for damages – Challenge to the method of calculating retirement pension rights – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court.
Operative part
Operative part:
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. Mr Hârsulescu is ordered to pay the costs.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.