ECLI:EU:T:2010:263•Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 June 2010.#Matratzen Concord GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark MATRATZEN CONCORD - Earlier national word mark MATRATZEN - Relative ground for refusal - Evidence of use of the earlier mark - Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based - Article 73 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009).#Case T-351/08.
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 June 2010.#Matratzen Concord GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark MATRATZEN CONCORD - Earlier national word mark MATRATZEN - Relative ground for refusal - Evidence of use of the earlier mark - Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based - Article 73 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009).#Case T-351/08.
ECLI:EU:T:2010:263Eu Chamb 07 TJun 30, 2010
Full text
Subject of the case
Operative part
Subject of the case
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 May 2008 (Case R 1034/2007‑2), relating to opposition proceedings between (i) Pablo Barranco Schnitzler and Mariano Barranco Rodriguez and (ii) Matratzen Concord GmbH.
Information relating to the case
>lt>4
Operative part
Operative part
The Court:
1. Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 30 May 2008 (Case R 1034/2007‑2);
2. Orders OHIM to pay the costs.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.