Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2010.#Helena Rubinstein SNC (T-345/08) and L’Oréal SA (T-357/08) v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word marks BOTOLIST and BOTOCYL - Earlier national figurative and word marks BOTOX - Relative ground for refusal - Damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009).#Joined cases T-345/08 and T-357/08.

ECLI:EU:T:2010:529Eu Chamb 03 TDec 16, 2010

Open source

Full text

Subject of the case
Operative part

Subject of the case

Re:

ACTIONS brought against, in Case T-345/08, the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 May 2008 (Case R 863/2007-1), relating to cancellation proceedings between Allergan, Inc. and Helena Rubinstein SNC, and, in Case T‑357/08, the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 June 2008 (Case R 865/2007-1), relating to cancellation proceedings between Allergan, Inc. and L’Oréal SA.

Information relating to the case

>lt>3

Operative part

Operative part

The Court:

1. Dismisses the actions;

2. Orders Helena Rubinstein SNC to pay the costs in Case T‑345/08;

3. Orders L’Oréal SA to pay the costs in Case T‑357/08.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.