ECLI:EU:T:2009:206•Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 17 June 2009.#Portuguese Republic v Commission of the European Communities.#EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from Community financing - Arable crops - Durum wheat - Period of 24 months - First communication referred to in Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 - On-the-spot checks - Remote sensing - Effectiveness of checks - Results of checks - Corrective action to be taken by the Member State concerned - Existence of financial harm to the EAGGF.#Case T-50/07.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 17 June 2009.#Portuguese Republic v Commission of the European Communities.#EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from Community financing - Arable crops - Durum wheat - Period of 24 months - First communication referred to in Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 - On-the-spot checks - Remote sensing - Effectiveness of checks - Results of checks - Corrective action to be taken by the Member State concerned - Existence of financial harm to the EAGGF.#Case T-50/07.
ECLI:EU:T:2009:206Eu Chamb 02 TJun 17, 2009
Full text
Subject of the case
Operative part
Subject of the case
Re:
APPLICATION for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2006/932/EC of 14 December 2006 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (OJ 2006 L 355, p. 96), in so far as it excludes from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Portuguese Republic in the sector of arable crops (durum wheat).
Operative part
Operative part
The Court:
1. Annuls Commission Decision 2006/932/EC of 14 December 2006 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) in so far as that decision excludes in respect of the Portuguese Republic certain expenditure incurred in the sector of arable crops (durum wheat) during the marketing year 2003;
2. Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3. Orders each party to bear its own costs.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.