Omnilex Logo
Legal research
Legal research
Corpus
Corpus

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Are you a lawyer?

Discover Omnilex, your workspace for faster legal research.

Already trusted by over 6,000 lawyers.

Try Omnilex
Settings
Settings
Court decisions

ECLI:EU:T:2012:101•Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 March 2012.#UPM-Kymmene Oyj v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of the infringement — Single and continuous infringement — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Undertaking playing a passive role — Proportionality.#Case T-53/06.

Open source

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 March 2012.#UPM-Kymmene Oyj v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of the infringement — Single and continuous infringement — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Undertaking playing a passive role — Proportionality.#Case T-53/06.

ECLI:EU:T:2012:101Eu Chamb 04 TMar 6, 2012

Open source

Full text

Subject of the case
Operative part

Subject of the case

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2005) 4634 final of 30 November 2005 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.354 — Industrial bags).

Operative part

Operative part

The Court:

1. Annuls Commission Decision C(2005) 4634 final of 30 November 2005 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.354 — Industrial bags) in so far as it holds UPM-Kymmene Oyj liable for the single and continuous infringement referred to in Article 1(1) thereof, in respect of the period prior to 10 October 1995;

2. Sets the amount of the fine imposed by Article 2(j) of that decision at EUR 50.7 million;

3. Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

4. Orders the European Commission and UPM-Kymmene each to bear their own costs.

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.