Omnilex Logo
Legal research
Legal research
Corpus
Corpus

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Are you a lawyer?

Discover Omnilex, your workspace for faster legal research.

Already trusted by over 6,000 lawyers.

Try Omnilex
Settings
Settings
Court decisions

ECLI:EU:T:2010:201•Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 May 2010.#Wieland-Werke AG, Buntmetall Amstetten GmbH and Austria Buntmetall AG v European Commission.#Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Copper plumbing tube industry - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Continuous and multiform infringement - Ne bis in idem principle - Fines - Actual impact on the market - Size of the relevant market - Duration of the infringement - Attenuating circumstances.#Case T-11/05.

Open source

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 May 2010.#Wieland-Werke AG, Buntmetall Amstetten GmbH and Austria Buntmetall AG v European Commission.#Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Copper plumbing tube industry - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Continuous and multiform infringement - Ne bis in idem principle - Fines - Actual impact on the market - Size of the relevant market - Duration of the infringement - Attenuating circumstances.#Case T-11/05.

ECLI:EU:T:2010:201Eu Chamb 08 TMay 19, 2010

Open source

Full text

Subject of the case
Operative part

Subject of the case

Re:

APPLICATION, first, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2004) 2826 of 3 September 2004 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E-1/38.069 – Copper plumbing tubes); second, in the alternative, for reduction of the fines imposed on the applicants by that decision; and third, by way of counterclaim by the Commission, for those fines to be increased.

Operative part

Operative part

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Dismisses the European Commission’s counterclaim;

3. Orders Wieland-Werke AG, Buntmetall Amstetten GmbH and Austria Buntmetall AG to bear their own costs and to pay 90% of the costs incurred by the Commission;

4. Orders the Commission to bear 10% of its own costs;

5. Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.