Omnilex Logo
Legal research
Legal research
Corpus
Corpus

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Are you a lawyer?

Discover Omnilex, your workspace for faster legal research.

Already trusted by over 6,000 lawyers.

Try Omnilex
Settings
Settings
Court decisions

ECLI:EU:C:2006:611•Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 September 2006.#El Corte Inglés, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Appeal - Community trade mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Likelihood of confusion - Figurative mark 'EMILIO PUCCI' - Opposition by the proprietor of the national figurative marks 'EMIDIO TUCCI' - Similarity between the goods.#Case C-104/05 P.

Open source

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 September 2006.#El Corte Inglés, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Appeal - Community trade mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Likelihood of confusion - Figurative mark 'EMILIO PUCCI' - Opposition by the proprietor of the national figurative marks 'EMIDIO TUCCI' - Similarity between the goods.#Case C-104/05 P.

ECLI:EU:C:2006:611Eu Chamb 06 CSep 28, 2006

Open source

Full text

Subject of the case
Operative part

Subject of the case

Re:

APPEAL brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2004 in Case T-8/03 El Corte Inglés v OHIM – Pucci , dismissing an action for the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 3 October 2002, dismissing the appeal brought by the applicant against the decision of the Opposition Division partially rejecting the opposition brought against the application for registration of the figurative Community trade mark ‘EMILIO PUCCI’ for goods in Classes 3, 18, 24 and 25.

Operative part

Operative part

The Court:

1. Dismisses the appeal;

2. Orders El Corte Inglés, SA to pay 80% of the costs;

3. Orders OHIM to pay 20% of the costs.

Wondering how this text applies to your situation?

Free consultation, no commitment

Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.