ECLI:EU:T:2006:251•Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 13 September 2006.#Sociedade de Indústrias Agricolas Açoreanas (Sinaga) SA v Commission of the European Communities.#Sugar - Poseima Programme - Regulation (EEC) No 1600/92 - Sugar forecast supply balance for the Azores - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Definition of traditional shipment to the rest of the Community - Statement of reasons - Compliance with essential procedural requirements.#Joined cases T-217/99, T-321/00, T-222/01.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 13 September 2006.#Sociedade de Indústrias Agricolas Açoreanas (Sinaga) SA v Commission of the European Communities.#Sugar - Poseima Programme - Regulation (EEC) No 1600/92 - Sugar forecast supply balance for the Azores - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Definition of traditional shipment to the rest of the Community - Statement of reasons - Compliance with essential procedural requirements.#Joined cases T-217/99, T-321/00, T-222/01.
ECLI:EU:T:2006:251Eu Chamb 04 TSep 13, 2006
Full text
Subject of the case
Operative part
Subject of the case
Re:
ACTION for annulment, firstly, of the annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1434/1999 of 30 June 1999 establishing the sugar forecast supply balance for the 1999/2000 marketing year for the Azores, Madeira and the Canary Islands provided for in Council Regulations (EEC) No 1600/92 and (EEC) No 1601/92 (OJ 1999 L 166, p. 58); secondly, of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1481/2000 of 6 July 2000 establishing the sugar forecast supply balance for 2000/2001 for the Azores, Madeira and the Canary Islands provided for in Council Regulations No 1600/92 and No 1601/92 (OJ 2000 L 167, p. 6) and also of the annex thereto and, thirdly, of the annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1281/2001 of 28 June 2001 establishing the forecast supply balance for sugar for the Azores, Madeira and the Canary Islands provided for in Council Regulations No 1600/92 and No 1601/92 for the period 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2001 (OJ 2001 L 176, p. 12), inasmuch as they set the quantities of sugar considered necessary for supplying the Azores.
Operative part
Operative part
The Court:
1. Dismisses the action;
2. Orders the applicant to pay the costs.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.