ECLI:EU:C:1989:32•Opinion of Mr Advocate General Van Gerven delivered on 24 January 1989. # Knoeckel, Schmidt & Cie, Papierfabriken AG v Hauptzollamt Landau/Pfalz. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Finanzgericht Rheinland-Pfalz - Germany. # Production refunds in the cereals and rice sector - Starch obtained partly from maize and partly from sugar-based products. # Case 13/88.
Opinion of Mr Advocate General Van Gerven delivered on 24 January 1989. # Knoeckel, Schmidt & Cie, Papierfabriken AG v Hauptzollamt Landau/Pfalz. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Finanzgericht Rheinland-Pfalz - Germany. # Production refunds in the cereals and rice sector - Starch obtained partly from maize and partly from sugar-based products. # Case 13/88.
ECLI:EU:C:1989:32Eu CjeuJan 24, 1989
Full text
Opinion of the Advocate-General
Opinion of the Advocate-General
++++
Mr Advocate General Walter Van Gerven delivered his Opinion on 24 January 1989 . (*) He concluded that the Court should rule as follows :
Article 4(3 ) of Commission Regulation ( EEC ) No 2169/86 of 10 July 1986 can validly make the grant of a refund conditional on the presentation of a declaration stating that the starch to be used has not been produced from a raw material other than maize, wheat, rice or potatoes .
(*) Original language : Dutch .
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.