ECLI:EU:C:1970:52•Order of the Court of 16 June 1970.#SA Chanel v Cepeha Handelsmaatschappij NV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Arrondissementsrechtbank Rotterdam - Netherlands.#Case 31-68.
Order of the Court of 16 June 1970.#SA Chanel v Cepeha Handelsmaatschappij NV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Arrondissementsrechtbank Rotterdam - Netherlands.#Case 31-68.
ECLI:EU:C:1970:52Eu Full Court CJun 16, 1970
Full text
Parties
Subject of the case
Grounds
Endorsements
Operative part
Parties
++++
IN CASE 31/68
REFERENCE TO THE COURT UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY BY THE ARRONDISSEMENTSRECHTBANK, ROTTERDAM, FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING IN THE ACTION PENDING BEFORE THAT COURT BETWEEN
SA CHANEL, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE IN NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE ( FRANCE ),
AND
CEPEHA HANDELSMAATSCHAPPIJ NV, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE IN ROTTERDAM,
Subject of the case
ON THE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 85 OF THE EEC TREATY ( AND OF THE RULES GOVERNING ITS APPLICATION ),
Grounds
BY JUDGMENT OF 3 DECEMBER 1968 RECEIVED AT THE REGISTRY ON 13 DECEMBER 1968 THE ARRONDISSEMENTSRECHTBANK, ROTTERDAM, MADE A REFERENCE TO THE COURT FOR AN INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 85 OF THE EEC TREATY .
THE COURT WAS NOTIFIED BY COMMUNICATION OF 29 JANUARY 1969 FROM THE SAID COURT THAT AN APPEAL HAD BEEN LODGED AGAINST THAT JUDGMENT AND THAT AS A RESULT " EXECUTION OF THE JUDGMENT IS DEFERRED ".
FOLLOWING THIS COMMUNICATION THE COURT DECIDED, BY ORDER OF 3 JUNE 1969, TO SUSPEND JUDGMENT .
BY A LETTER RECEIVED AT THE REGISTRY ON 12 JUNE 1970, THE REGISTRAR OF THE ARRONDISSEMENTSRECHTBANK INFORMED THE COURT THAT A JUDGMENT OF 6 MAY 1970 OF THE GERECHTSHOF, THE HAGUE, HAD AMENDED THE JUDGMENT OF 3 DECEMBER 1968 .
ACCORDINGLY THE REFERENCE FOR INTERPRETATION HAS LOST ITS PURPOSE .
THE COSTS INCURRED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES WHICH HAD SUBMITTED ITS OBSERVATIONS TO THE COURT ARE NOT RECOVERABLE . AS THESE PROCEEDINGS ARE, IN SO FAR AS THE PARTIES TO THE MAIN ACTION ARE CONCERNED, IN THE NATURE OF A STEP IN THE ACTION PENDING BEFORE THE ARRONDISSEMENTSRECHTBANK, ROTTERDAM, THE DECISION ON COSTS IS A MATTER FOR THAT COURT .
Endorsements
ON THOSE GROUNDS,
HAVING REGARD TO THE STATE OF THE PROCEDURE;
HAVING REGARD TO THE ORDER OF THE COURT OF 3 JUNE 1969;
HAVING REGARD TO THE LETTER FROM THE REGISTRAR OF THE ARRONDISSEMENTSRECHTBANK RECEIVED AT THE REGISTRY OF THE COURT ON 12 JUNE 1970;
UPON HEARING THE REPORT OF THE JUDGE-RAPPORTEUR;
UPON HEARING THE OPINION OF THE ADVOCATE-GENERAL;
HAVING REGARD TO ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY;
HAVING REGARD TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Operative part
THE COURT
HEREBY ORDERS :
CASE 31/68 IS REMOVED FROM THE REGISTER OF THE COURT .
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.