Beihilfe for private clinic services; leave to appeal on points of law

BVerwG 5 B 56/13, 5 B 56/13 (5 C 7/14)Bverwg / Division 5Mar 20, 2014Granted

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court allowed the defendant's complaint and granted leave to appeal on points of law. It held that the case raises a question of fundamental importance under § 132(2) no. 1 VwGO, namely whether expenses for inpatient treatment in a private clinic are reasonable under § 5(1) sentence 1 BVO BW.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; leave to appeal on points of law for fundamental importance: Revision is to be allowed where the case affords an opportunity to clarify a previously unresolved, general legal question decisive for the dispute. This may also be the case where the permissibility or reasonableness of reimbursement claims under beihilferechtliche provisions for inpatient treatment in a private clinic requires clarification (consid. 1 f.).

Full text

BVerwG — 5 B 56/13, 5 B 56/13 (5 C 7/14), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-03-20

Aktenzeichen: 5 B 56/13, 5 B 56/13 (5 C 7/14)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 5 Abs 1 S 1 BhV BW 1995, § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg, 23. April 2013, Az: 2 S 2287/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 5. Senat

Titelzeile

Beihilfefähigkeit von Leistungen von Privatkliniken; Revisionszulassung

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

2 Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, die Frage der Angemessenheit von Aufwendungen gemäß § 5 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BVO BW bei der stationären Unterbringung in einer Privatklinik zu klären.

Keywords

beihilfeprivate clinicrevisionfundamental importancereasonableness of expenses

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be allowed for fundamental importance under § 132(2) Nr. 1 VwGO.

Extracted holding

Yes. The complaint was admissible and well-founded; revision is to be allowed because the case raises a question of fundamental importance.

Extracted reasoning

The Senate considered that revision may clarify whether expenses for inpatient treatment in a private clinic are appropriate within the meaning of § 5(1) sentence 1 BVO BW.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.