projects

Revision admitted for project-related zoning plan minimum requirements

BVerwG 4 BN 43/13, 4 BN 43/13 (4 CN 4/14)Bverwg / Division 4Jan 16, 2014Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court allowed the complaint and admitted the revision. The court considered the legal question of what minimum provisions a project-related offer zoning plan must contain to satisfy enforceability under Section 1(3) sentence 1 BauGB, especially where the plan also covers land not owned by the project developer, to be a question of fundamental significance. The order also provisionally fixed the dispute value for the revision proceedings under the GKG.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admissibility of revision for fundamental significance in relation to a project-related offer zoning plan. Revision is to be admitted where the proceedings can clarify which minimum determinations such a plan must contain to satisfy the enforceability requirement of § 1 Abs. 3 sentence 1 BauGB, in particular if the plan extends beyond the project developer’s own parcels. A question is of fundamental significance if its clarification is capable of advancing the law beyond the individual case (consid. 1).

Full text

BVerwG — 4 BN 43/13, 4 BN 43/13 (4 CN 4/14), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-01-16

Aktenzeichen: 4 BN 43/13, 4 BN 43/13 (4 CN 4/14)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 1 Abs 3 S 1 BauGB, § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, 27. Mai 2013, Az: 2 D 37/12.NE, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; Mindest-Festsetzungen eines "projektbezogenen Angebotsbebauungsplans"

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, welche Mindest-Festsetzungen ein "projektbezogener Angebotsbebauungsplan" im Hinblick auf die nach § 1 Abs. 3 Satz 1 BauGB erforderliche Vollzugsfähigkeit enthalten muss, wenn der Bebauungsplan nicht nur Grundstücke des Projektträgers erfasst.

2 Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Keywords

revision admissibilityfundamental significancezoning planenforceabilityplanning lawproject-related plandispute value

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the revision should be admitted for clarification of the minimum content required for a project-related offer zoning plan when it also covers land not owned by the project developer.

Extracted holding

Yes. The case raises a question of fundamental significance concerning the planning requirement of enforceability under Section 1(3) sentence 1 BauGB.

Extracted reasoning

The answer to the legal question can contribute to clarifying what minimum provisions such a zoning plan must contain if it extends beyond the project developer’s own plots.

Key legal question

Provisional assessment of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The court provisionally fixed the dispute value for the revision proceedings on the basis of the GKG provisions cited in the order.

Extracted reasoning

The order states the statutory basis for the provisional dispute value without further dispute-specific reasoning.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.