projects

Revision admitted on inspection rights of hunting association member

BVerwG 3 B 69/11, 3 B 69/11 (3 C 20/12)Bverwg / Division 3Jun 25, 2012Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court held that the complaint against non-admission of revision was well founded. The case raises a question of fundamental importance under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO, namely the scope of a hunting association member's right to inspect the association's files and books. The court therefore admitted revision so that this issue can be clarified in the main proceedings.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admission of revision for fundamental importance; a case has fundamental significance when it is likely to enable clarification of a legal question of general relevance that is not yet settled in a way sufficient for the uniform development of the law. This is the case where the proceedings offer an opportunity to clarify the ground and scope of a hunting association member's right of inspection into the association's files and books (consid. 1).

Full text

BVerwG — 3 B 69/11, 3 B 69/11 (3 C 20/12), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-06-25

Aktenzeichen: 3 B 69/11, 3 B 69/11 (3 C 20/12)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt, 14. April 2011, Az: 2 L 118/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 3. Senat

Titelzeile

Anspruch auf Einsicht in Unterlagen der Jagdgenossenschaft; Revisionszulassung

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zu. Sie wird dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, Grund und Umfang des Einsichtsrechts eines Jagdgenossen in Akten und Bücher der Jagdgenossenschaft zu klären.

Keywords

revision admissionfundamental importanceinspection righthunting associationnon-admission complaint

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be admitted because the case has fundamental significance under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.

Extracted holding

Yes. The complaint succeeds because the case will likely allow clarification of the nature and scope of a hunting association member's right to inspect the association's files and books.

Extracted reasoning

The legal question is unresolved enough to warrant clarification by the Federal Administrative Court and is of general importance beyond the individual case.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.