Key legal question
Whether the complaint against denial of leave to appeal had to succeed because the case had fundamental significance regarding approval requirements for private substitute schools under Art. 7(4) sentence 3 GG.
Extracted holding
Yes. The case raised a question of fundamental significance, especially as to the meaning of the requirement of 'educational objectives' in Art. 7(4) sentence 3 GG.
Extracted reasoning
The matter could provide the Senate with an opportunity for further clarification of the constitutional conditions for approval of private schools as substitutes for public schools.