projects

Revision admitted on limits of entitlement to job assignment

BVerwG 2 B 61/11, 2 B 61/11 (2 C 6/12)Bverwg / Division 2Mar 15, 2012Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court granted the plaintiff's request for leave to appeal on a point of fundamental significance. It held that revision could clarify whether the holder of a senior civil-service post listed only once in the budget must accept restrictions on the right to office-appropriate employment. The decision concerns only admissibility of the revision and does not resolve the merits.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admissibility of revision for fundamental significance in a civil-service case concerning Art. 33 Abs. 5 GG. Revision is to be admitted where a legally unresolved and general question of law arises that is capable of clarification in the revision proceedings. Such fundamental significance exists in particular where it must be determined whether, and under what conditions, the holder of a budgeted senior post shown only once in the establishment plan must tolerate a limitation of the claim to office-appropriate employment; consid. 1.

Full text

BVerwG — 2 B 61/11, 2 B 61/11 (2 C 6/12), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-03-15

Aktenzeichen: 2 B 61/11, 2 B 61/11 (2 C 6/12)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: Art 33 Abs 5 GG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht Rheinland-Pfalz, 18. Januar 2011, Az: 2 A 11114/10, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat

Titelzeile

Amtsangemessene Beschäftigung des Beamten; Einschränkung des Anspruchs

Gründe

1 Die Revision der Klägerin ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. In dem Revisionsverfahren kann geklärt werden, ob und unter welchen Voraussetzungen der Inhaber eines im Haushaltsplan seines Dienstherrn nur einmal ausgewiesenen Spitzenamtes eine Einschränkung seines Anspruchs auf amtsangemessene Beschäftigung hinzunehmen hat.

Keywords

civil serviceoffice-appropriate employmentrevision admissibilityfundamental significancebudgeted senior post

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be admitted for fundamental significance under Section 132(2)(1) VwGO.

Extracted holding

Yes. The question whether, and under what conditions, the holder of a senior post listed only once in the employer's budget must accept a restriction of the right to employment appropriate to the office is capable of clarification in revision.

Extracted reasoning

The case raises a legally unresolved question of general significance concerning the scope of the constitutional right to office-appropriate employment.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.