Key legal question
Whether revision should be admitted for the case concerning cost reimbursement between public youth welfare authorities under § 89a(3) SGB VIII.
Extracted holding
Revision was admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance and may clarify the scope of § 89a(3) SGB VIII.
Extracted reasoning
The Court considered that the revision could give the Senate an opportunity to clarify the application of the cost-reimbursement rule in § 89a(3) SGB VIII.