projects

Leave to appeal on planning justification of retail-centre protections

BVerwG 4 BN 23/11, 4 BN 23/11 (4 CN 6/11)Bverwg / Division 4Nov 29, 2011Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court allowed the complaint against the refusal to admit revision. It held that the case is of fundamental importance because the revision proceedings may clarify the requirements for the planning-law justification of land-use plan provisions intended to strengthen central supply areas. The court also set the dispute value for the complaint proceedings and the provisional dispute value for the revision proceedings under the cited fee statutes.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; requirements for leave to appeal on questions concerning the planning-law justification of land-use plan provisions to strengthen central supply areas; revision is to be admitted where the case can clarify abstract standards for the städtebauliche Rechtfertigung of such designations. The existence of a need for clarification on the prerequisites of the planning measure suffices to establish fundamental importance (consid. 1).

Full text

BVerwG — 4 BN 23/11, 4 BN 23/11 (4 CN 6/11), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-11-29

Aktenzeichen: 4 BN 23/11, 4 BN 23/11 (4 CN 6/11)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, 12. April 2011, Az: 10 D 42/09.NE, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung von zentralen Versorgungsbereichen

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, welche Anforderungen an die städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung von zentralen Versorgungsbereichen zu stellen sind.

2 Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.

Keywords

leave to appealfundamental importanceplanning lawcentral supply areasdispute valuerevision

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be allowed under Section 132(2)(1) VwGO because the case raises a question of fundamental importance.

Extracted holding

Revision was admitted because the appeal could clarify what requirements apply to the planning-law justification of land-use plan provisions aimed at strengthening central supply areas.

Extracted reasoning

The court found a need for clarification on the abstract legal requirements for such planning designations, which justified leave to appeal for reasons of fundamental importance.

Key legal question

How the costs and provisional value of the proceedings are to be set.

Extracted holding

The costs assessment was based on the GKG provisions cited by the court, and the provisional value for the revision proceedings was set accordingly.

Extracted reasoning

The court referred to the applicable provisions on court fees and value assessment without further elaboration.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.