projects

Leave to appeal on zoning justification for central retail areas

BVerwG 4 B 8/11, 4 B 8/11 (4 C 13/11)Bverwg / Division 4Nov 29, 2011Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court upheld a complaint and allowed revision under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO. The court held that the proceedings could help clarify what requirements apply to the urban-planning justification of zoning rules designed to strengthen central retail areas. It also fixed the dispute value for the complaint and, provisionally, for the revision proceedings under the GKG.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; revision admissibility for questions concerning the urban-planning justification of land-use plan provisions strengthening central retail areas. A revision is to be allowed where the appeal proceedings can contribute to clarifying the requirements of the statutory justification of such planning determinations and the question is of fundamental significance. Dispute value determinations are made under §§ 47, 52, 63 GKG.

Full text

BVerwG — 4 B 8/11, 4 B 8/11 (4 C 13/11), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-11-29

Aktenzeichen: 4 B 8/11, 4 B 8/11 (4 C 13/11)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, 7. Dezember 2010, Az: 10 A 332/08, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; Anforderungen an die städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung zentraler Versorgungsbereiche

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, welche Anforderungen an die städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung von zentralen Versorgungsbereichen zu stellen sind.

2 Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.

Keywords

revision admissibilityfundamental significanceurban planningzoningcentral retail areasdispute value

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be allowed because the case raises a question about the requirements for the planning justification of zoning provisions aimed at strengthening central retail areas.

Extracted holding

Revision was admitted because the appeal proceedings could clarify the legal requirements for the urban-planning justification of such zoning provisions.

Extracted reasoning

The question is capable of contributing to clarification of a matter of fundamental significance under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.