projects

Plan approval; protection against construction noise

BVerwG 7 B 29/11, 7 B 29/11 (7 C 29/11)Bverwg / Division 7Nov 21, 2011Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

In a plan-approval dispute over protection against construction noise, the defendant's complaint succeeded. The Federal Administrative Court admitted the revision because the case raises a fundamental legal question: whether the intervention thresholds of the AVV Baulärm can define the reasonableness limit for noise impacts on the exterior contact area of retail shops under Section 74(2) sentence 2 VwVfG in conjunction with Section 22(1) BImSchG.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admission of revision for fundamental importance in a plan-approval noise-protection case. The revision may be admitted where clarification is required as to whether, and under which conditions, the intervention values of the AVV Baulärm can be used to determine the limit of reasonableness for noise exposure in the exterior contact area of retail premises under § 74 Abs. 2 sentence 2 VwVfG in conjunction with § 22 Abs. 1 sentence 1 BImSchG (consid. 2).

Full text

BVerwG — 7 B 29/11, 7 B 29/11 (7 C 29/11), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-11-21

Aktenzeichen: 7 B 29/11, 7 B 29/11 (7 C 29/11)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 74 Abs 2 S 2 VwVfG, § 22 Abs 1 BImSchG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof, 24. Januar 2011, Az: 22 A 09.40045, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 7. Senat

Titelzeile

Planfeststellung; Schutz gegen Baulärm

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde der Beklagten ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

2 Das Revisionsverfahren kann Gelegenheit geben, die Frage zu klären, ob und gegebenenfalls unter welchen Voraussetzungen die Eingriffswerte der AVV-Baulärm im Rahmen eines Schutzanspruchs aus § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG i.V.m. § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG geeignet sind, die Zumutbarkeitsgrenze für Lärm im Außenkontaktbereich von Ladengeschäften zu bestimmen.

Keywords

plan approvalconstruction noiserevision admissibilityfundamental importancereasonableness limitretail premises

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be admitted for the question of construction-noise limits under the protection claim in plan approval law.

Extracted holding

Revision was admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Administrative Court saw a need to clarify whether, and under what conditions, the intervention thresholds of the AVV Baulärm can determine the reasonableness limit for noise affecting the exterior contact area of retail premises under Section 74(2) sentence 2 VwVfG in conjunction with Section 22(1) BImSchG.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.