projects

Participation of equal opportunities officer in disciplinary proceedings

BVerwG 2 B 88/10, 2 B 88/10 (2 C 62/11)Bverwg / Division 2Oct 26, 2011Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the defendant’s revision against a disciplinary judgment of the Higher Administrative Court of Berlin-Brandenburg. The court held that the case has fundamental importance because the revision can clarify under what conditions the equal opportunities officer must be involved in an administrative disciplinary proceeding under § 19(1) BGleiG.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; § 69 BDG; admission of revision for fundamental importance in disciplinary proceedings: A revision is to be admitted where a previously unresolved legal question of general significance arises, here the conditions under which the equal opportunities officer must be involved in an administrative disciplinary proceeding under § 19(1) BGleiG. It suffices that the revision proceedings can clarify the question and that its resolution is capable of affecting the outcome of the case (consid. 1).

Full text

BVerwG — 2 B 88/10, 2 B 88/10 (2 C 62/11), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-10-26

Aktenzeichen: 2 B 88/10, 2 B 88/10 (2 C 62/11)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 19 Abs 1 BGleiG, § 69 BDG, § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg, 28. Oktober 2010, Az: 82 D 1.09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat

Titelzeile

Beteiligung der Gleichstellungsbeauftragten im Disziplinarverfahren

Gründe

1 Die Revision des Beklagten ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO und § 69 BDG zuzulassen. In dem Revisionsverfahren kann geklärt werden, unter welchen Voraussetzungen die Gleichstellungsbeauftragte in einem behördlichen Disziplinarverfahren nach § 19 Abs. 1 BGleiG zu beteiligen ist.

Keywords

disciplinary proceedingsrevision admissibilityfundamental importanceequal opportunities officerparticipation

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be admitted for fundamental importance regarding the participation of the equal opportunities officer in disciplinary proceedings.

Extracted holding

Revision is admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance concerning the conditions under which the equal opportunities officer must be involved in an administrative disciplinary proceeding.

Extracted reasoning

The legal question under § 19(1) BGleiG has not been clarified and can be decided in the revision proceedings; this justifies admission under § 132(2)(1) VwGO in conjunction with § 69 BDG.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.