projects

Standing of purchaser with priority notice in plan approval

BVerwG 9 B 75/11, 9 B 75/11 (9 C 14/11)Bverwg / Division 9Oct 24, 2011Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court allowed the plaintiff's complaint and admitted revision. The case concerns whether a purchaser of land, protected by a priority notice in the land register and having timely raised objections, is entitled to bring an action against a plan approval decision that affects parts of the purchased property. The court treated this as a question of fundamental importance under Section 132(2)(1) VwGO. It also provisionally set the value in dispute for the revision proceedings under the GKG provisions cited.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; standing under § 42 Abs. 2 VwGO of a purchaser protected by a priority notice against a plan approval decision: The question whether a buyer of immovable property, in whose favor a priority notice is entered in the land register and who has timely raised objections, is entitled to challenge a plan approval decision affecting parts of the purchased property raises a question of fundamental importance and may justify admission of revision (consid. 1). The provisional determination of the amount in dispute for revision follows the GKG provisions cited (consid. 2).

Full text

BVerwG — 9 B 75/11, 9 B 75/11 (9 C 14/11), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-10-24

Aktenzeichen: 9 B 75/11, 9 B 75/11 (9 C 14/11)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO, § 42 Abs 2 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Schleswig-Holstein, 9. Juni 2011, Az: 1 KS 1/11, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 9. Senat

Titelzeile

Planfeststellungsbeschluss; Klagebefugnis eines Grundstückskäufers; Auflassungsvormerkung

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Rechtsfrage geben, ob der Käufer eines Grundstücks, zu dessen Gunsten eine Auflassungsvormerkung in das Grundbuch eingetragen ist und der fristgerecht Einwendungen erhoben hat, gegen einen Planfeststellungsbeschluss, mit dem Teile des Kaufgrundstücks in Anspruch genommen werden, klagebefugt im Sinne des § 42 Abs. 2 VwGO ist.

2 Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Keywords

standingplan approvalpriority noticeproperty purchaserrevision admissibilityfundamental importance

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether a purchaser with a registered priority notice who timely objected has standing to challenge a plan approval decision affecting the purchased land.

Extracted holding

The legal question is of fundamental importance and warrants clarification in revision proceedings.

Extracted reasoning

The court held that the complaint was admissible and well-founded because the case raises a general question under Sections 132(2)(1) and 42(2) VwGO about the purchaser's standing; revision was therefore to be admitted.

Key legal question

Whether leave to appeal should be granted due to fundamental importance.

Extracted holding

Revision is admitted on the ground of fundamental importance.

Extracted reasoning

The court found that the proposed revision could clarify whether the purchaser's position and priority notice confer standing to sue against the plan approval decision.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.