projects

Violation of tendering duty and development contributions

BVerwG 9 B 3/11Bverwg / Division 9Sep 16, 2011Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court upheld the plaintiff’s complaint against the non-admission of revision. It held that the appeal raises a question of fundamental importance: what consequences a breach of the obligation to tender services under an urban-development or development contract has for the development contribution liability of landowners when the municipality allocates the development costs billed by the development agency. The court therefore allowed the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; fundamental importance exists where a case raises a clarifiable, general question of law whose answer is relevant beyond the individual dispute. A complaint against non-admission of revision is successful if the contested judgment leaves unresolved the legal consequences of a potentially material breach of a procurement/tendering obligation in the context of passing on development costs under a development contribution scheme. The need for clarification of the interplay between contractual procurement duties and contribution liability may justify admission of revision (consid. 1).

Full text

BVerwG — 9 B 3/11, Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-09-16

Aktenzeichen: 9 B 3/11

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO, § 124 BauGB

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht Rheinland-Pfalz, 3. November 2010, Az: 6 A 10699/10, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 9. Senat

Titelzeile

Verstoß gegen Ausschreibungspflicht; Kosten der Erschließung

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde der Klägerin ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, welche Rechtsfolgen ein Verstoß gegen die Verpflichtung zur Ausschreibung der Leistungen eines städtebaulichen Vertrages oder Erschließungsvertrages auf die Erschließungsbeitragspflicht der Grundstückseigentümer im Erschließungsgebiet hat, auf die die Gemeinde die ihr von dem Erschließungsträger in Rechnung gestellten Kosten der Erschließungsmaßnahme umlegt.

Keywords

tendering dutydevelopment contributionsurban development contractfundamental importancerevision admission

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether leave to appeal should be granted because the case raises a question of fundamental significance under § 132(2)(1) VwGO.

Extracted holding

The complaint is admissible and well-founded; revision is to be allowed because the case raises a question of fundamental significance.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Administrative Court found it necessary to clarify what legal consequences a breach of the duty to invite tenders for services under an urban-development or development agreement has for the development contribution liability of landowners when the municipality passes on the costs invoiced by the development agency.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.