projects

Revision admitted on kinship foster care and foster allowance

BVerwG 5 B 13/11, 5 B 13/11 (5 C 12/11)Bverwg / Division 5Jul 1, 2011Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court upheld the complaint against non-admission of revision in a dispute about assistance in raising children and foster allowance. It found that the case raises questions of fundamental importance concerning kinship foster care and the conditions for foster allowance under SGB VIII. The revision was therefore admitted under Section 132(2)(1) VwGO.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; fundamental importance as a ground for admission of revision; questions concerning kinship foster care and foster allowance under §§ 27 Abs. 2a, 33 Satz 1, 39 SGB VIII may justify admission where they are capable of clarification in the revision proceedings. The requirement of fundamental importance is satisfied when the case presents unresolved legal questions of general significance whose answer can contribute to the development and uniform application of federal law (consid. 1–2).

Full text

BVerwG — 5 B 13/11, 5 B 13/11 (5 C 12/11), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-07-01

Aktenzeichen: 5 B 13/11, 5 B 13/11 (5 C 12/11)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 27 Abs 2a SGB 8, § 33 S 1 SGB 8, § 39 SGB 8

Vorinstanz: vorgehend OVG Lüneburg, 13. Januar 2011, Az: 4 LB 257/09

Spruchkörper: 5. Senat

Titelzeile

Hilfe zur Erziehung; Pflegegeld

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde der Kläger ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

2 Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, zu den Voraussetzungen der Verwandtenpflege und der Gewährung von Pflegegeld nach den § 27 Abs. 2a, § 33 Satz 1, § 39 SGB VIII Stellung zu nehmen.

Keywords

revision admissionfundamental importancekinship foster carefoster allowancechild welfare

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be admitted for fundamental importance concerning kinship foster care and foster allowance under SGB VIII.

Extracted holding

Yes. The complaint was admissible and well-founded; revision was admitted because the case raises questions of fundamental importance.

Extracted reasoning

The Senate held that the revision may clarify the requirements of kinship foster care and the granting of foster allowance under Sections 27(2a), 33 sentence 1, and 39 SGB VIII.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.