BVerwG 5 B 1/11, 5 B 1/11 (5 C 2/11)•Exclusion of compensation for substantial support of Nazi regime
BVerwG 5 B 1/11, 5 B 1/11 (5 C 2/11)Bverwg / Division 5Feb 9, 2011Granted
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Administrative Court allowed the defendant’s complaint and granted leave to appeal (revision). It held that the case raises a question of fundamental importance regarding the interpretation of § 1(4) AusglLeistG, so further clarification by the court is warranted.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admission of revision for fundamental importance. Revision is to be allowed where the case presents a question requiring further clarification in the interest of uniform or developing case law. A complaint is well-founded if the challenged judgment implicates an unresolved legal question of general significance, here the scope of § 1 Abs. 4 AusglLeistG (consid. 1-2).
Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-02-09
Aktenzeichen: 5 B 1/11, 5 B 1/11 (5 C 2/11)
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Normen: § 1 Abs 4 AusglLeistG
Vorinstanz: vorgehend VG Berlin, 8. Oktober 2010, Az: 4 K 5.10, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 5. Senat
Ausschluss von Ausgleichsleistungen; erhebliches Vorschubleisten für das nationalsozialistische System
1 Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.
2 Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Auslegung des § 1 Abs. 4 AusglLeistG geben.
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether revision should be allowed due to the fundamental importance of the interpretation of § 1(4) AusglLeistG.
Revision was admitted because the case could further clarify the interpretation of § 1(4) AusglLeistG.
The complaint was admissible and well-founded; the appeal presented a question of fundamental importance within the meaning of § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.