projects

Rules on selecting physician for fitness examination

BVerwG 2 B 31/10, 2 B 31/10 (2 C 7/11)Bverwg / Division 2Feb 3, 2011Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the plaintiff's revision in litigation over retirement and a medical examination. The decisive question is which legal constraints govern the authority's selection of the examining physician under § 54(1) LBG SH old version. The Court found that this issue has fundamental importance and can be clarified in revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admissibility of revision for fundamental importance. A revision is to be admitted where the case presents a question of law of fundamental significance requiring clarification in the interest of the development and uniform application of the law. This is the case here as to the legal constraints binding the administration in selecting the physician who is to examine a civil servant's fitness for duty under § 54(1) LBG SH old version.

Full text

BVerwG — 2 B 31/10, 2 B 31/10 (2 C 7/11), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-02-03

Aktenzeichen: 2 B 31/10, 2 B 31/10 (2 C 7/11)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 54 Abs 1 BG SH 2005

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Schleswig-Holstein, 29. Januar 2010, Az: 3 LB 39/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat

Titelzeile

Versetzung in den Ruhestand; ärztliche Untersuchung

Gründe

1 Die Revision des Klägers ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. In dem Revisionsverfahren kann geklärt werden, welchen rechtlichen Bindungen die Behörde bei der Bestimmung des Arztes nach § 54 Abs. 1 LBG SH a.F. unterliegt, der einen Beamten auf seine Dienstfähigkeit hin untersuchen soll.

Keywords

revision admissibilityfundamental importancephysician selectionfitness for servicecivil servantsretirement

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be admitted for the legal question of the authority's binding constraints when selecting a physician under § 54(1) LBG SH old version.

Extracted holding

The revision is admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance that can be clarified in the revision proceedings.

Extracted reasoning

The Court held that the legal limits governing the administration's choice of physician for the examination of a civil servant's fitness for service are a question of fundamental significance within the meaning of § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.