Revision admitted in compensation claim for delayed promotion

BVerwG 2 B 9/10, 2 B 9/10 (2 C 6/11)Bverwg / Division 2Jan 17, 2011Granted

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the revision in a case concerning a civil servant's claim for damages due to delayed promotion. It held that the case could contribute to clarifying the legal prerequisites for such compensation claims, thereby satisfying the criterion of fundamental significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; revision admissibility on grounds of fundamental significance in a claim for damages due to delayed promotion. Fundamental significance exists where the intended decision is capable of clarifying unresolved legal prerequisites of a compensation claim. It is sufficient that the case raises a question whose clarification is suitable to promote the uniform development and application of the law; the court need not decide the merits of the claim at this stage.

Full text

BVerwG — 2 B 9/10, 2 B 9/10 (2 C 6/11), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-01-17

Aktenzeichen: 2 B 9/10, 2 B 9/10 (2 C 6/11)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 28. Oktober 2009, Az: 2 L 209/06, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat

Titelzeile

Beamter; Anspruch auf Schadensersatz

Gründe

1 Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Die angestrebte Entscheidung erscheint geeignet, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen eines Anspruchs auf Schadensersatz wegen verzögerter Beförderung beizutragen.

Keywords

revision admissibilityfundamental significancecivil servantdamagesdelayed promotion

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be admitted because the case has fundamental significance regarding damages for delayed promotion.

Extracted holding

Revision was admitted because the proposed decision could clarify the conditions for a damages claim arising from delayed promotion.

Extracted reasoning

The court considered the matter suitable for clarifying the prerequisites of such a claim, which establishes fundamental significance under the procedural rules.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.