projects

Clarification of § 45(9) StVO for truck traffic restrictions

BVerwG 3 B 30/10, 3 B 30/10 (3 C 40/10)Bverwg / Division 3Dec 21, 2010Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court upheld the complaint against the refusal to admit revision. It held that the case raises a question of fundamental importance: what legal significance attaches to a traffic restriction measure under § 45(9) sentence 3 StVO when it not only diverts toll-avoiding traffic but also restricts heavy goods traffic already present on the route. The court indicated that the revision would likely permit further clarification in light of its earlier judgment in BVerwG 3 C 18.07.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; fundamental importance of a complaint against denial of leave to appeal in a traffic-restriction case under § 45 Abs. 9 S. 3 StVO. A question is of fundamental importance where the revision proceedings are likely to afford an opportunity to clarify, in a legally significant way, the scope and limits of a traffic measure whose effects extend beyond diverting toll-avoidance traffic and also reach pre-existing heavy-lorry traffic on the route. The decisive point is the unresolved legal significance of that additional restrictive effect; continuation of prior case-law may be required (consid. 2).

Full text

BVerwG — 3 B 30/10, 3 B 30/10 (3 C 40/10), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-12-21

Aktenzeichen: 3 B 30/10, 3 B 30/10 (3 C 40/10)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 45 Abs 9 S 3 StVO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof, 18. Januar 2010, Az: 11 BV 08.791, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 3. Senat

Titelzeile

Beschränkungen oder Verbote des fließenden Verkehrs

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zu.

2 Das Revisionsverfahren wird dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, im Anschluss an sein Urteil vom 13. März 2008 - BVerwG 3 C 18.07 - (BVerwGE 130, 383) die Frage weiter zu klären, welche rechtliche Bedeutung dem Umstand zukommt, dass eine auf § 45 Abs. 9 Satz 3 StVO gestützte Maßnahme nicht nur den Mautausweichverkehr, sondern darüber hinaus auch den bereits zuvor auf der Strecke vorhandenen Schwerlastverkehr unterbindet.

Keywords

traffic restrictionheavy goods vehiclesfundamental importanceleave to appealroad traffic regulation

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the complaint should be admitted because the case has fundamental importance.

Extracted holding

Yes. The complaint succeeded because the matter raises a question of fundamental importance under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.

Extracted reasoning

The revision proceedings will likely allow further clarification, in continuation of BVerwG 3 C 18.07, of the legal significance of the fact that a measure based on § 45(9) sentence 3 StVO not only diverts toll-avoiding traffic but also restricts heavy-lorry traffic already using the route.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.