projects

Revision allowed on interpretation of compensation benefits statute

BVerwG 5 B 32/10, 5 B 32/10 (5 C 26/10)Bverwg / Division 5Sep 9, 2010Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Administrative Court granted the plaintiffs’ complaint and admitted the revision. It held that the case has fundamental significance within the meaning of § 132(2) no. 1 VwGO because the proceedings may clarify the interpretation of § 1(1) sentence 1 and § 1(2) sentence 1 AusglLeistG.

Omnilex headnote

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; revision may be allowed for fundamental significance if the case offers an occasion to clarify unresolved questions of statutory interpretation. Where the challenged judgment turns on the meaning of § 1 Abs. 1 S. 1 and Abs. 2 S. 1 AusglLeistG, leave to appeal is warranted when the appellate proceedings can contribute to further doctrinal clarification (consid. 1-2).

Full text

BVerwG — 5 B 32/10, 5 B 32/10 (5 C 26/10), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-09-09

Aktenzeichen: 5 B 32/10, 5 B 32/10 (5 C 26/10)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 1 Abs 1 S 1 AusglLeistG, § 1 Abs 2 S 1 AusglLeistG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend VG Greifswald, 4. Mai 2010, Az: 2 A 836/08, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 5. Senat

Titelzeile

Anspruch auf Ausgleichsleistung; Auslegung

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerden der Klägerinnen sind zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

2 Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Auslegung des § 1 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 2 Satz 1 AusglLeistG geben.

Keywords

revisionfundamental significancestatutory interpretationcompensation benefitsleave to appeal

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether revision should be allowed for fundamental significance concerning interpretation of § 1(1) sentence 1 and § 1(2) sentence 1 AusglLeistG.

Extracted holding

Revision was admitted because the case raises questions of fundamental significance and may further clarify the interpretation of the cited provisions.

Extracted reasoning

The appeal is admissible and well-founded; the appeal proceedings can provide the Senate an opportunity to further clarify the scope of § 1(1) sentence 1 and § 1(2) sentence 1 AusglLeistG under § 132(2) no. 1 VwGO.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.