BVerwG 7 C 14/09•Proceedings ended by court settlement; lower judgments declared ineffective
BVerwG 7 C 14/09Bverwg / Division 7Jul 5, 2010Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
In this administrative-law dispute concerning a subsidy for a party-affiliated foundation, the Federal Administrative Court proposed a settlement under Section 106 sentence 2 VwGO. The defendant accepted on 28 June 2010 and the plaintiff on 29 June 2010. The Court therefore held that the proceedings had ended by judicial settlement and ordered the case discontinued. It also declared the judgments of the Thuringian Higher Administrative Court and the Administrative Court of Gera ineffective.
§ 106 S. 2 VwGO; acceptance of a court-proposed settlement by both parties terminates the proceedings without a decision on the merits. The court must discontinue the case and declare the prior judgments ineffective; no further substantive review is required once the settlement is concluded (consid. 1).
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-07-05
Aktenzeichen: 7 C 14/09
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Normen: § 106 S 2 VwGO
Vorinstanz: vorgehend Thüringer Oberverwaltungsgericht, 26. November 2008, Az: 3 KO 364/08, Urteilvorgehend VG Gera, 17. Juli 2006, Az: XX, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 7. Senat
Zuschuss an parteinahe Stiftung
1 Mit Beschluss vom 16. Juni 2010 hat das Bundesverwaltungsgericht gemäß § 106 Satz 2 VwGO den Parteien den Abschluss eines Vergleichs vorgeschlagen. Der Beklagte hat dem Vergleichsvorschlag mit Schriftsatz vom 28. Juni 2010 zugestimmt. Der Kläger hat mit Schriftsatz vom 29. Juni 2010 dem vorgeschlagenen Vergleich ebenfalls zugestimmt. Damit ist das Verfahren durch Abschluss eines gerichtlichen Vergleichs beendet worden (vgl. § 106 Satz 2 VwGO). Es ist deshalb einzustellen. Die Urteile des Thüringer Oberverwaltungsgerichts vom 26. November 2008 und des Verwaltungsgerichts Gera vom 17. Juli 2006 sind für wirkungslos zu erklären.
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the proceedings should be terminated after a court-proposed settlement was accepted by both parties.
The proceedings were terminated by the concluded judicial settlement and must be discontinued.
Once both parties accepted the court's settlement proposal under Section 106 sentence 2 VwGO, the case ended without a merits decision.
Whether the lower-court judgments should remain effective after the settlement.
The judgment of the Thuringian Higher Administrative Court and the judgment of the Administrative Court of Gera were declared ineffective.
Because the dispute ended by judicial settlement, the prior judgments could no longer have effect.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.